<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lethal Products:  Billboards With Depictions of Guns and Violence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banbillboardblight.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=3885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banbillboardblight.org/?p=3885</link>
	<description>Protecting the visual environment of Los Angeles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruceboyer</title>
		<link>http://banbillboardblight.org/?p=3885&#038;cpage=1#comment-2551</link>
		<dc:creator>bruceboyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 02:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banbillboardblight.org/?p=3885#comment-2551</guid>
		<description>For those of you who are behind the curve, allow me to enlighten you as to how the system works. The billboard companies want to erect billboards, the billboard companies can charge higher rates when other billboard companies may not errect billboards. The Councilman are given the ability to largely restrict a new billboard permit in their district. The politician wants the support/endorsement and votes of a &quot;community group&quot; the &quot; Mothers against blah blah&quot;. In exchange for their permits and blocking others, the billboard company agrees to donate billboardds that support and promote a group (there by giving them tens of thousands of dollars worth of advertising for free) in exchange for their support forthe councilman. Ererybody in the exchange gets what they want. The honorable Councilman does not have to deslare a campaign contribution from the billboard company, because they did not donate, to him! Can you do the math now? Last part of the puzzle, why does the NRA oppose the &quot;mothers against blah blah&quot;? because they are not a group that wants to &quot;protect children&quot; they are a front group for those who want to take away your Right and your ability to defend yourself. These groups are ant-women as they want women to be victims, not being able to defend themselves. The NRA lists these groups as &quot;enemies&quot; of your 2nd Amenment Right because they do not support your Rights, they are enemies of your Right to self0defence. As such the NRAopposes those people, as I think they correctly should.
Responses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who are behind the curve, allow me to enlighten you as to how the system works. The billboard companies want to erect billboards, the billboard companies can charge higher rates when other billboard companies may not errect billboards. The Councilman are given the ability to largely restrict a new billboard permit in their district. The politician wants the support/endorsement and votes of a &#8220;community group&#8221; the &#8221; Mothers against blah blah&#8221;. In exchange for their permits and blocking others, the billboard company agrees to donate billboardds that support and promote a group (there by giving them tens of thousands of dollars worth of advertising for free) in exchange for their support forthe councilman. Ererybody in the exchange gets what they want. The honorable Councilman does not have to deslare a campaign contribution from the billboard company, because they did not donate, to him! Can you do the math now? Last part of the puzzle, why does the NRA oppose the &#8220;mothers against blah blah&#8221;? because they are not a group that wants to &#8220;protect children&#8221; they are a front group for those who want to take away your Right and your ability to defend yourself. These groups are ant-women as they want women to be victims, not being able to defend themselves. The NRA lists these groups as &#8220;enemies&#8221; of your 2nd Amenment Right because they do not support your Rights, they are enemies of your Right to self0defence. As such the NRAopposes those people, as I think they correctly should.<br />
Responses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
