Billboard Company Lobbying: Half a Million in First Quarter of 2016

Billboard company lobbyists Morrie Goldman, left, and David Gershwin. Clear Channel paid Goldman's firm $90,000 and Gershwin's $45,000 in the first quarter of 2016

Billboard company lobbyists Morrie Goldman, left, and David Gershwin. Clear Channel paid Goldman’s firm $90,000 and Gershwin’s $45,000 in the first quarter of 2016

Billboard companies spent $507,000 lobbying Los Angeles city officials in the first quarter of 2016, according to City Ethics Commission records. Those companies and their executives also donated a total of $9,100 to six city councilmembers running for re-election in 2017.

(more…)

Action Needed: L.A.’s New Citywide Sign Ordinance At PLUM Committee April 19

 

Sign Ordinance Urgent 2

The Los Angeles City Council’s PLUM committee is scheduled to take up the new citywide sign ordinance next Tuesday, April 19. This is a very significant meeting, because the committee will be discussing the ordinance for the first time since the City Planning Commission rejected several bad proposals previously made by the committee, as well as added some significant protections for communities fighting the blight of billboards.

Please send an e-mail to committee members urging passage of the ordinance as approved by the City Planning Commission, and if possible, plan to attend the PLUM committee meeting. This may be the last opportunity to make our voices heard in a public hearing before the ordinance goes to the full city council. And there will be heavy pressure to weaken the ordinance from industry lobbyists and others with a vested in interest in more outdoor advertising on our city streets. Click here for further details, contact information, and a sample letter.

Disconnection? As L.A. Ponders Allowing Digital Billboards More Evidence Questions Their Safety

Clear Channel digital billboard on 210 freeway

Clear Channel digital billboard on 210 freeway

The billboard industry’s PR apparatus generates a number of questionable claims on behalf of digital billboards. They support local businesses, they advance non-profit causes, they provide critical emergency information, they help catch dangerous criminals and find missing children. But the most dubious may be that digital billboards are no more distracting than static signs and therefore pose no hazard to motorists on freeways and busy commercial streets.

(more…)

Thumbs Down: Court’s Reaction to Billboard Company’s Plan for New Digital Billboards in L.A.

SM Blvd 4

Digital billboard in West L.A. in 2010.  It has since been turned off.

A Louisiana billboard company’s hopes to put up new digital billboards in a wide area of Los Angeles appear to have run aground in the California Court of Appeals.

(more…)

Clear Channel’s L.A. Billboards: Ignoring Outdoor Advertising Industry Code of Principles

Collage 2

The billboard with the tequila ad is less than 500 ft. from the preschool and the church.

Several months ago, we pointed out the fact that a Clear Channel billboard on Lincoln Blvd. in Venice violated an outdoor advertising industry code regarding the proximity of alcohol ads to schools and places of worship.  That ad for New Amsterdam vodka was recently removed, but what’s displayed now on that 52 ft. high, 624 sq. ft. sign?  An ad for Camarena tequila.

(more…)

Loosening the Purse Strings: Billboard Companies Spent Millions Lobbying L.A. Officials in 2015

Lobbying 5

With the city’s legislative agenda containing such hot-button issues as allowing new digital billboards and granting amnesty to unpermitted and non-compliant signs, it’s little surprise that L.A. billboard companies spent almost $2.3 million last year lobbying council members and other city officials.

(more…)

Councilman Wants Amnesty for Unpermitted Billboards Predecessor Wanted to Take Down 14 Years Ago

Clear Channel billboard without permit. Inset, left, Hal Bernson; right, Mitchell Englander

2015 photo of a Clear Channel billboard found in 2002 to lack a permit. Inset, left, Hal Bernson; right, Mitchell Englander

What a difference a dozen years makes. Back in 2002, L.A. City Councilman Hal Bernson called for the removal of an unpermitted billboard in his San Fernando Valley district and the prosecution of its owner. But in 2014, the councilman now representing that district, Mitchell Englander, called for granting “amnesty” to that billboard and almost 1,000 others the city has identified as either lacking permits or having been altered in violation of their permits.

(more…)

Latest Outdoor Ad Scourge: Illegal Signs on Plywood Walls

1020 Victoria Ave 3

A dozen years ago, a company called MetroLights put up hundreds of unpermitted advertising signs that mimicked the legal bus shelter and kiosk signs on public sidewalks. A few years later scofflaw companies named SkyTag, World Wide Rush, and Vanguard draped buildings all over the city with multi-story supergraphic signs. Now an unknown company is blighting the landscape with unpermitted advertising signs on plywood walls thrown up around businesses, churches, and other sites.

(more…)

Alcohol, Tobacco, Guns and Sex—Staples of Outdoor Advertising in Los Angeles

New Amsterdam Vodka 1

Students coming to Animo Venice Charter High school by bus from areas like Inglewood and South L.A. get off at a stop on Venice Blvd. and walk a half mile north on Lincoln Blvd. to the school campus. One a recent school day, this is what they’d have seen on their way to morning classes.

(more…)

Follow the Money: Billboard Companies and Their Lobbyists Support City Councilman’s Campaign

L.A. City Councilman Mitch Englander, right, with John Ek, head of one of the city's biggest lobbying firms.

L.A. City Councilman Mitchell Englander, right, with John Ek, head of one of the city’s most influential lobbying firms.  Credit:  Mayor Sam’s Sister City

In June of this year, Clear Channel Outdoor donated $1,500 to L.A. City Councilman Mitchell Englander’s campaign for County Board of Supervisors in the 2016 election. That same month, a lobbying firm that represents the company donated the same amount, the maximum allowed, although such a contribution would have been illegal if Englander was running for a city rather than county office.

(more…)

« Previous PageNext Page »