A Hollywood property owner’s five-year quest to force the city to allow supergraphic signs on a Sunset Blvd. office building apparently reached an end last week, when the U.S. Supreme court declined to review a lower court ruling that upheld the city’s right to prohibit the signs. It is the second time in past two years the high court has refused to review a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling affirming the city’s constitutional right to ban new billboards and supergraphic signs.Dennis Hathaway
- PLUM Committee to Sign Companies: “Romance Me & Finance Me!”
- Billboard Relocation: Latest Plan to Unleash Digital Billboards in L.A.
- Orwellian Logic: When Illegal Signs are Really Legal
- Getting it Wrong: An Open Letter to L.A. City Councilman Mitchell Englander (and his PLUM committee colleagues)
- Coming Attractions: New Digital Billboards on L.A. City Streets?
- Failure to Get the Memo: New L.A. Bus Shelter Ads With Guns
- Alcohol Ads on Billboards: Marketing to Youth?
- L.A.’s Digital Billboard Debate: It’s the Revenue, Stupid